Where available, the references of the Briefing Notes 1 can be downloaded here by clicking the author. The references are organised into Articles & Lectures, Reports and Books.

Articles & Lectures

Bernardes, S., Keogh, E., & Lima, M.L.  (2008).  Bridging the gap between pain and gender research: A selective literature review.  European Journal of Pain.  12(4), 427–440.  doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2007.08.007

Burnley, C.E., et al.  (2008).  Gender Dimension in Geo-spatial Security Research: Disciplinary Confrontations.  Journal of International Women’s Studies.  9(3).

Cahill, L.  (2006).   Why sex matters for neuroscience.  Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 7, 477-484.  doi: 10.1038/nrn1909

Chalfin, M., Murphy, E.R., & Karkazis, K.A.  (2008).Women’s Neuroethics? Why Sex Matters for Neuroethics.  The American Journal of Bioethics.  8(1), 1-2.  doi: 10.1080/15265160701829038

Ding, W.W., Murray, F., & Stuart, T.E.  (2006).  Gender Differences in Patenting in the Academic Life Sciences.  Science.   313(5787): 665-667.  doi: 10.1126/science.1124832

Eagly, A.H. & Johannesen-Schmidt, M.C.  (2001). The leadership styles of women and men.  Journal of Social Issues.  57(4), 781-797.  doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00241

Fedigan, L. (1986).   The Changing Role of Women in Models of Human Evolution.  Annual Review of Anthropology.   15, 25-66.  doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.15.100186.000325

Gaziano, J.M. & Buring, J.E.  (2009).  Physicians’ Health Study Web Site.  Retrieved from http://phs.bwh.harvard.edu

Giuri, P., et al.  (2007).  Inventors and invention processes in Europe: Results from the PatVal-EU survey.  Research Policy.   36(8), 1107-1127.  doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.07.007

Greenspan, J., et al.  (2007).  Studying sex and gender differences in pain and analgesia: A consensus report.  Pain.  132, S26–S45.  doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.10.014

Harding, S. & McGregor, E.  (1996).  The Gender Dimension of Science and Technology.  World Science Report.  UNESCO.

Holdcroft, A.  (2007).  Integrating the Dimensions of Sex and Gender into Basic Life Sciences Research: Methodologic and Ethical Issues. Gender Medicine.  4(2), S64-S74.  doi: 10.1016/S1550-8579(07)80048-9

Howard, P.  “Gender Bias in Ethnobotany: Propositions and Evidence of a Distorted Science and Promises of a Brighter Future.”  Distinguished Economic Botanist Lecture, Kew Royal Botanical Gardens.  November 2006.

King, Sir D.  “The Challenges of the 21st Century.” 2008 Duncan Davies Lecture.  The Royal Society, London.  15 July 2008.

Kjelsberg, M.O., Cutler, J.A. & Dolecek, T.A.  (1997).  Brief Description of the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial.  American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 65, 191S-195S.

Lawrence, P.  (2008).  Lost in publication: how measurement harms science.  Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics.  8, 9-11.  doi: 10.3354/esep00079

Lenton, A.P., Bruder, M. & Sedikides, C.  (2009).  A Meta-Analysis on the Malleability of Automatic Gender Stereotypes.  Psychology of Women Quarterly.  33, 183-196.  doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01488.x

Lie, M.  (2002).  Science as Father? Sex and Gender in the Age of Reproductive Technologies.  European Journal of Women's Studies.  9(4), 381-399.  doi: 10.1177/13505068020090040201

Marsh, H.W & Jayasinghe, U.W (2009). Gender Differences in Peer Reviews of Grant Applications: A Substantive-Methodological  Synergy in Support of the Null Hypothesis. Submitted to Multivariate Behaviour Research 

Nightingale, A.  (2006).  The Nature of Gender: work, gender and environment.  Environment and Planning D: Society and Space.  24(2), 165 – 185.  doi: 10.1068/d01k

Nosek, B.A. et al.  (2009).  National differences in gender–science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.  106 (26), 10593–10597.  doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809921106

Risberg, G., Johansson, E., & Hamberg, K.  (2009).  A theoretical model for analysing gender bias in medicine.  International Journal for Equity in Health.   8(28).   doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-8-28

Ruiz-Cantero, M.T.  et al (2007).   A Framework to Analyse Gender Bias in Epidemiological Research.  Journal of Epidemioogy and Community Health61, ii46-ii53.   doi: 10.1136/jech.2007.062034

Sinnes, A.  (2006).  Three Approaches to Gender Equity in Science Education.  NorDina.  3, 72-83.

Smith, K.H.   “Innovation indicators and the knowledge economy: concepts, results and policy challenges.”  Innovation and enterprise creation: Statistics and indicators [Conference]. November 23-24 2000.  Sophia Antipolis, France.

Spelke, E.S.  (2006).  Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for Mathematics and Science?  A Critical Review.  American Psychologist.  60(9), 950-8.  doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.9.950

Symonds, M.R., et al.  (2006).  Gender differences in publication output: Towards and unbiased metric of research performance.  PLoS ONE.  1(1), e127.  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000127

Valian, V.  (1999).  The cognitive bases of gender bias.  Brooklyn Law Review.  65, 1037-1061.

Reports

Brittle, C. & Bird, C.A.  (2007).  Literature Review on Effective Sex- and Gender-Based Systems/Models of Care.  Produced for the Office on Women’s Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.   Arlington, VA: Uncommon Insights, LLC. <

Burri, S. & Prechal, S.  (2008).  EU Gender Equality Law.  Brussels: European Commission Director-General for Employment, Social Affairs, & Equal Opportunity. 

Busolt, U., Kugele, K., & Tinsel, I. (2009). European Studies on Gender Aspects of Inventions – Statistical Survey and Analysis of Gender Impact on Inventions (ESGI).  Produced for the European Commission in the 6th Framework Program.  Brussels: Director-General for Research

Cacace, M.  (2009).  PRAGES: Guidelines for Gender Equality Programmes in Science.  Rome: ASDO. 

European Commission.  (2001).  Gender in Research: Gender Impact Assessment of the specific programmes of the Fifth Framework Programme – An Overview.  Brussels: Director-General for Research. 

European Commission.  (2003a).  Researchers In The European Research Area: One Profession, Multiple Careers.  Brussels.  Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament.  COM(2003) 436 final. 

European Commission.  (2003b).  VADEMECUM: Gender Mainstreaming in the 6th Framework Programme – Reference Guide for Scientific Officers/Project Officers.  Brussels: Director-General for Research. 

European Commission.  (2003c).  Waste of Talents: turning private struggles into a public issue – Women and Science in the Enwise countries.  Brussels: Director-General for Research. 

European Commission.  (2004).  Gender and Excellence in the Making.  Brussels: Director-General for Research.

European Commission.  (2005a).  The European Charter for Researchers.  The Code of Conduct for Their Recruitment.  Brussels:  Director-General for Research. 

European Commission.  (2005b).  Women and Science: Excellence and Innovation – Gender Equality in Science.  Brussels: Director-General for Research. 

European Commission.  (2005c).  Women in Industrial Research: A wake up call for European Industry.  Brussels: Director-General for Research. 

European Commission.  (2006).  Women in Science & Technology: The Business Perspective.  Brussels: Director-General for Research.

European Commission.  (2007a).  Improving knowledge transfer between research institutions and industry across Europe: embracing open innovation.  Brussels.  Communication from the Commission to the Council, Parliament, European Economic and Social Committee, and The Committee of the Regions.  COM(2007) 182 final. 

European Commission.  (2007b).  The European Research Area: New Perspectives.  Green Paper 04.04.2007.  Brussels: Director-General for Research. 

European Commission.  (2008a).  A More Research-Intensive and Integrated European Research Area: Science, Technology and Competitiveness Key Figures Report 2008/2009.  Brussels: Director-General for Research.

European Commission.  (2008b).  Benchmarking Policy Measures for Gender Equality in Science.  Brussels: Director-General for Research.

European Commission.  (2008c).  Mapping the Maze: Getting More Women to the Top in Research.  Brussels: Director-General for Research.

European Commission.  (2008d).  Report of the ERA Expert Group: Realizing a Single Labor Market for Researchers.  Brussels: Director-General for Research.

European Commission.  (2008e).  Better Careers and More Mobility: A European Partnership for Researchers.  Brussels.  Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament.  COM(2008)317 final. 

European Commission.  (2009a).  Challenging Futures of Science in Society, Emerging trends and cutting-edge issues – Report of the MASIS Expert Group.  Brussels: Director-General for Research. 

European Commission.  (2009b).  Consultation on the Future "EU 2020" Strategy.  Bussles.  Commission Working Document.  COM(2009)647 final

European Commission.  (2009c).  EU Policy Challenges 2009-2019. A report to the President.  Brussels:  Director-General for Internal Policies.

European Commission.  (2009d).  First FP7 Monitoring Report.  Brussels: Director-General for Research.

European Commission.  (2009e).  Monitoring Progress Toward Gender Equality in the Sixth Framework Programme: Synthesis Report.  Brussels:  Director-General for Research. 

European Commission.  (2009f).  Second FP7 Monitoring Report.  Brussels: Director-General for Research.

European Commission.  (2009g).  She Figures 2009: Statistics and Indicators on Gender Equality in Science.  Brussels: Director-General for Research.

European Commission.  (2009h).  The Gender Challenge in Research Funding: Assessing the European National Scenes. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

European Commission.  (2009i).  The role of community research policy in the knowledge-based  economy – Expert Group Report.  Brussels: Director-General for Research. 

European Commission.  (2009j).  Women in Science & Technology: Creating Sustainable Careers.  Brussels: Director-General for Research

European Commission: Helsinki Group on Women and Science. (2002).  National Policies on Women and Science in Europe.  Brussels: Director-General for Research. 

European Parliament.  (2008).  Resolution of 31 January 2008 on European Research Area: New Perspectives.  (2007/2187(INI)). 

European Technology Assessment Network (ETAN).  (2000).  Science Policies in the EU: Promoting excellence through mainstreaming gender equality.  Brussels: Director-General for Research. 

Kugele, K. (2008).  Patents invented by women and their participation in research and development: A European comparative approach.  In Godfroy-Genin, A. (Ed.).  Proceedings of PROMETEA Conference: “Women in Engineering and Technology Research.”   26-27 October 2007.  Lit Verlag, Zurich.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (1999).  A Study on the Status of Women Faculty in Science at MIT.  Boston: MIT. 

Rees, T. (2002).  The Helsinki Group on Women in Science: National Policies on Women in Science in Europe.  Brussels: Director-General for Research, European Commission. 

Sjöberg, S.  (2002).  Report from the SAS-project: A cross-cultural study of factors of relevance for the teaching and learning of science and technology.  University of Oslo: Dept. of Teacher Education and School Development.

Stephan, P. (2002).  Appendix C: Using Human Resource Data to Illuminate Innovation and Research Utilization.  In Merrill, S.A. & McGeary, M. (Eds.).  Summary of a Workshop: Using Human Resource Data to Track Innovation.  National Research Council.  Washington, DC: National Academy Pres. 

Whittington, K. (2009).  “Patterns of Male and Female Scientific Dissemination in Public and Private Science.” In Science and Engineering Careers in the United States: An Analysis of Markets and Employment.  Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

Books

Ariyabandu, M. & Wickremasinghe M.  (2003). Gender Dimensions in Disaster Management:  A Guide for South Asia.  Rugby, UK: Practical Action South Asia Publication.

Collinson, D.L.& Hearn, J. (1996).  Men as Managers, Managers as Men: Critical Perspectives on Men, Masculinities, and Managements.  London, UK: Sage Publications.

Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy; National Academy of Sciences.  (2007). Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering.  Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Daston, L. & Galison, P.  (2007).  Objectivity.   Cambridge, MA: Zone Books.

Hearn, J.  (1992).  Men in the Public Eye: The Construction and Deconstruction of Public Men and Public Patriarchies.  London, UK: Routledge.

Lorber, J.  (2001).  Gender Inequality: Feminist Theories and Politics.  New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Rose, H.  (1994).  Love, Power and Knowledge: Towards a Feminist Transformation of the Sciences. London, UK: Polity Press.

Schiebinger, L.  (2001).  Has Feminism Changed Science?  Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Schiebinger, L. (Ed.).  (2008).  Gendered Innovations in Science and Engineering.  Palo Alto, CA: Sanford University Press.

Stolte-Heiskanen, V. (Ed.).  (1991).  Women in science: Token women or gender equality.  New York, NY: Berg Publishers.