Where available, the references of the Consensus Report - Recommendations for Action on the Gender Dimension in Science can be downloaded here by clicking the author
Barjak, F. & Robinson, S. (2008). International collaboration, mobility and team diversity in the life sciences: impact on research performance. Social Geography, 3(1), 23-36.
Bonetta, L. (2010, February 12). Reaching Gender Equity in Science: The Importance of Role Models and Mentors. Science, 889-895
Bowles, H. R. & McGinn, K. L. (2008). Untapped potential in the study of negotiation and gender inequality in organisations. In J. P. Walsh & A. P. Brief (Eds.), The Academy of Management Annals Volume 2 (99-132). New York: Routledge.
Bowles, H. R., Babcock, L. C., & McGinn, K. L. (2005). Constraints and Triggers: Situational mechanics of gender in negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 951-965.
Burri, S. & Prechal, S. (2008). EU Gender Equality Law. Brussels: European Commission Director-General for Employment, Social Affairs, & Equal Opportunity.
Carrell, S.E., Page, M.E., & West, J.E. (2009). Sex and Science: How Professor Gender Perpetuates the Gender Gap. NBER Working Paper Series, w14959.
Chen, C. (1998). Understanding Career Development: a convergence of perspectives. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 50(3), 437-461. NA available at Routledge
Cisco Systems. (2009). Style of the Sexes: Examining the Working Styles of Men and Women. White Paper. San Jose, CA: Cisco Systems.
Daston, L. & Galison, P. (2007). Objectivity. Cambridge, MA: Zone Books.
Desrochers, S. & Sargent, L.D. (2004). Boundary/Border Theory and Work-Family Integration. Organisation Management Journal, 1(1), 40-48.
Desvaux, G. & Devillard, S. (2008). Women Matter 2: Female leadership, a competitive edge for the future. McKinsey & Company: Paris, France.
Eagly, A.H. & Johannesen-Schmidt, M.C. (2001). The leadership styles of women and men. Journal of Social Issues. 57(4), 781-797. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00241
European Commission. (2005). The European Charter for Researchers. The Code of Conduct for Their Recruitment. Brussels: Director-General for Research.
European Commission. (2005). Women and Science: Excellence and Innovation – Gender Equality in Science. Brussels: Director-General for Research.
European Commission. (2006). Women in Science & Technology: The Business Perspective. Brussels: Director-General for Research.
European Commission. (2008). Benchmarking Policy Measures for Gender Equality in Science. Brussels: Director-General for Research.
European Commission. (2009). Consultation on the Future "EU 2020" Strategy. Bussles. Commission Working Document. COM(2009)647 final
European Commission. (2009). She Figures 2009: Statistics and Indicators on Gender Equality in Science. Brussels: Director-General for Research.
European Technology Assessment Network (ETAN). (2000). Science Policies in the EU: Promoting excellence through mainstreaming gender equality. Brussels: Director-General for Research.
Evans, C. et al. (2007). Implementing Diversity Policies: Guiding Principles – A Guide for ITEC and other engineering businesses who want to benefit from employing a diverse workforce. Report funded by The Royal Academy of Engineering in partnership with Equalitec.
Gonäs, L., Bergman, A. & Karlsson, J. C. (2009). Equal Opportunities, Segregation and Gender Based Wage Differences at a Swedish University. Journal of Industrial Relations, 51(5), 669-686.
Greenspan, J., et al. (2007). Studying sex and gender differences in pain and analgesia: A consensus report. Pain, 132, S26–S45. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.10.014
Holdcroft, A. (2007). Gender bias in research: how does it affect evidence based medicine? Journal of The Royal Society of Medicine, 100, 2-3. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.100.1.2
Isaac, C., Lee B. & Carnes, M. (2009). Interventions That Affect Gender Bias in Hiring: A Systematic Review Academic Medicine, 84 (10), 1440-1446.
Klinge, I. & Wiesemann, C. (Eds.). (2010). Sex and Gender in Biomedicine: Theories, Methodologies, Results. Gottingen, Germany: Universitätsverlag Göttingen.
Kolb, D.M. (2009). Too Bad for the Women or Does it Have to Be? Gender and Negotiation Research over the Past Twenty-Five Years. Negotiation Journal, 25(4), 515-531.
Lubinski, D. & Benbow, C.P. (2006). Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth After 35 Years: Uncovering Antecedents for the Development of Math-Science Expertise. Perspectives of Psychological Science, 1(4), 316-345.
Marsh, H.W., et al. (2009). Gender Effects in Peer Reviews of Grant Proposals: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Comparing Traditional and Multilevel Approaches. Review of Educational Research 79(3), 1290-1326.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (1999). A Study on the Status of Women Faculty in Science at MIT. Boston: MIT.
Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science. Science 159(3810), 56-63
Palich, L.E. & Livingstone, L.A. (2003). Improving Research Performance: Teamwork trumps solo endeavors. Graziadio Business Report, 6(2).
Paludi, A.M. & Bauer, W.D. (1983). Goldberg revisited: What's in an author's name. Sex Roles 9 (3), 387-390.
Risberg, G., Johansson, E., & Hamberg, K. (2009). A theoretical model for analysing gender bias in medicine. International Journal for Equity in Health. 8(28). doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-8-28
Rossiter, M., Paranjape, B. & Pantano, V. (2006). Performance measurement systems: successes, failures and future – a review. Measuring Business Excellence, 10(3), 4-14.
Ruiz-Cantero, M.T. et al (2007). A Framework to Analyse Gender Bias in Epidemiological Research. Journal of Epidemioogy and Community Health. 61, ii46-ii53. doi: 10.1136/jech.2007.062034
Schiebinger, L., Henderson, A.D. & Gilmartin, S.K. (2008). Dual-Career Academic Couples: What Universities Need to Know. Michelle R. Clayman Institute for Gender Research, Stanford University: Stanford, CA.
Schiebinger, L. (2008). Gendered Innovations in Science and Engineering. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Sible, J.C., Wilhelm, D.E. & Lederman, M. (2006). Teaching Cell and Molecular Biology for Gender Equity. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 5, 227-238.
Trix, F. & Psenka, C. (2003). Exploring the color of glass: letters of recommendation for female and male medical faculty. Discourse & Society, 14(2), 191-220.
Van den Brink, M. (2010). Behind the Scenes of Science.Gender Practices in the Recruitment and Selection of professors in the Netherlands. Pallas Publications, Amsterdam.
Wald, C. & Wu, C. (2010). Of Mice and Women: The Bias in Animal Models. Science, 327 (5973), 1571-1572. doi: 10.1126/science.327.5973.1571
|